Legal Opinion

Cudd v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 28, 1983No. 0031PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

An administrator and a designated beneficiary brought these actions to collect medical and life insurance benefits respectively under a group policy issued by the respondent, John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company, to the decedent, Kenneth Joe Cudd, through his employer, the Kohler Company. Albert D. Cudd, the decedent’s administrator, and Ella W. Cudd, the decedent’s designated beneficiary under the group policy’s life insurance provision, appeal the lower court’s direction of verdicts in both cases. We affirm.

The evidence in the two cases, which were consolidated for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. HiottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  3. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  4. Thompson v. Pacific MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  5. Shears v. All States Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1942

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Hook Ex Rel. Estate of Summers v. RothsteinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Winburn v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Trotter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  4. Clark v. RossCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  5. Proctor v. Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API