Bang v. State

OPINION

SEERDEN, Justice.

A jury found appellant guilty of burglary, and the trial court assessed punishment at ten years in prison, probated. We reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand for new trial.

In his first point of error, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, an appellate court views the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict to determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. Baugh v. State, 776 S.W.2d 583, 585…