Legal Opinion

Willis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 16, 1990No. 155-87PublishedCited by 191 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S AND THE STATE’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

McCORMICK, Presiding Judge.

A jury found appellant, Barry O’Neal Willis, guilty of theft for which he received a sentence of two years confinement. He appealed. The Dallas Court of Appeals reversed appellant’s conviction finding that the trial court had erred in refusing to submit in its jury charge an instruction concerning appellant’s good faith purchase. Willis v. State, 724 S.W.2d 87, 91 (Tex. App.-Dallas 1986). The lower appellate court also decided that the statutory presumption provided in Texas Penal Code Section…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by191 opinions

  1. Walters v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. Mays v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  3. Ex Parte NailorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  4. Giesberg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  5. Juarez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010

186 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API