Oleksiw v. Weidener
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
The question raised by this appeal is whether in a malpractice action expert testimony may be elicited from a physician defendant called by plaintiff “as if under cross-examination,” pursuant to Section 2317.07, Revised Code.
This section provides as follows:
“At the instance of the adverse party, a party may be examined as if under cross-examination, orally, by way of deposition, like any other witness * * *. The party calling for such examination shall not thereby be concluded but may rebut it by evidence.”
The obvious purpose of this section is to permit the production of all pertinent…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- McDermott v. Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
- Langford v. IssenhuthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- Hull v. PlumeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
- State, Use of Miles v. BraininCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Iverson v. LancasterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Whiteleather v. YosowitzOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Schreiner v. KarsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
- Abbey v. JacksonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Giacobazzi v. FetzerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.