Legal Opinion

Clear Creek Community Services District v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 8, 2011No. 10-420 CPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

SWEENEY, Judge.

Before the court is plaintiffs motion for discovery (“motion”).1 Plaintiff, a local government agency providing water service in the Clear Creek watershed in California, filed a three-count complaint alleging breach by the United States of a 2005 long-term renewal contract (“the Contract”). According to plaintiff, the government failed to (1) repair portions of — and perform operation and maintenance (“O & M”) services on — the Muletown Conduit, a pipe that distributes water, and (2) provide plaintiff with the amount of water to which…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  2. Kissi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Confidential Informant 59-05071 v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  4. Anham, Fzco v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. Alta Wind I Owner Lessor C v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API