Legal Opinion
Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 26, 2014No. 1:13-cv-00465PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge
On December 9, 2013, defendant filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint pursu ant to RCFC 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) (“motion to dismiss”). In response, plaintiffs, on December 20, 2013, filed a motion for continuance to permit discovery pursuant to RCFC 56(d) (“motion for discovery”). In their motion, plaintiffs argue that defendant’s dismissal motion challenges many of the allegations of their complaint and, in light of this, they are entitled to discovery. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants plaintiffs’ motion for discovery.
Plaintiffs articulate three…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- John G. Rocovich, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lea v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Evans v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- ANGELLY v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2024
- Akanthos Opportunity Fund, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Appaloosa Investment Limited Partnership I v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.