Legal Opinion

Anham, Fzco v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 15, 2015No. 13-414CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion for an Enlargement of Time; RCFC 56(d); RCFC 6(b); Partial Summary Judgment; Affidavit or Declaration Required to Request Discovery Prior to Responding to a Motion for Summary Judgment.

ORDER

WILLIAMS, Judge.

On August 20, 2015, Defendant filed a motion for a 150-day enlargement of time until February 18, 2016, to respond to Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment. Plaintiff opposed the request.

This case involves Defendant’s alleged breach of a settlement agreement following Plaintiffs bid protest challenging its exclusion from a procurement for services in Afghanistan. “The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keebler Company v. Murray Bakery ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  2. Theisen Vending Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  3. Clear Creek Community Services District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. Jade Trading, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. Padilla v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beres v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
  2. Silver State Land LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API