Legal Opinion

Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola, Inc

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 28, 2012No. 12-35352PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

In this interlocutory appeal, Motorola appeals from the district court’s preliminary injunction to enjoin Motorola temporarily from enforcing a patent injunction that it obtained against Microsoft in Germany. We review the district court’s grant of a foreign anti-suit injunction under the deferential abuse-of-discretion standard, and affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

The parties are involved in ongoing contract and patent litigation before the district court. We recite here only the factual and procedural history most relevant to this interlocutory appeal.

A. Standard-setting…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Halray Harman v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. SD3, LLC v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  2. Ilsa Saravia v. Jefferson Sessions, IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Bae Sys. Tech. Solution & Servs., Inc. v. Republic of Korea's Def. Acquisition Program Admin.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  4. FTC v. Qualcomm Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. Huawei Techs., Co. v. Samsung Elecs. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2018

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API