Legal Opinion
Halray Harman v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 4, 2000No. 98-35780PublishedCited by 1,346 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Opinion filed February 17, 2000, slip op. 1915, and appearing at 203 F.3d 1151 (9th Cir.2000), is amended as follows:
At slip op. 1922, delete the first paragraph under “II” up to footnote “4” and replace with the following:
It is settled law that a district court’s decision to affirm, reverse or modify a determination of the Social Security Administration is reviewed de novo on appeal. Ramirez v. Shalala, 8 F.3d 1449, 1451 (9th Cir.1993). We also review de novo a district court’s determination to remand a case to the Commissioner. Once that determination is made, however, the Social…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Reddick v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Elizabeth J. HAMMOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis BOWEN, Secretary, Department of Health & Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,346 opinions
- Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lingenfelter v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Treichler v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Debbra Hill v. Michael AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Anne J. Holohan v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissionerof SsaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
1,341 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.