Legal Opinion
Bae Sys. Tech. Solution & Servs., Inc. v. Republic of Korea's Def. Acquisition Program Admin.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided March 6, 2018No. 17-1041; 17-1070PublishedCited by 121 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge:
These appeals arise from a contract dispute between a United States defense contractor, BAE Systems Technology Solutions & Services, Inc. (BAE), and the Republic of Korea and its Defense Acquisition Program Administration (collectively Korea). BAE sought a declaratory judgment that it had not breached any contractual obligation to Korea and a permanent injunction barring Korea from prosecuting its suit against BAE in Korean courts. The district court granted BAE the requested declaration but refused to issue a permanent anti-suit injunction. Korea appeals,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Young v. City of Mount RanierCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- Kelvion, Inc. v. PetroChina Canada Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Farhad Azima v. Rak Investment AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Pamela Whitaker v. Monroe Staffing Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- NextEra Energy Global Holdings B.V. v. Kingdom of SpainCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024
- Scepter, Inc. v. Nolan Transp. Grp., LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.