Muzio v. Erickson
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. '
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment in favor of defendants in an action to quiet title to an alleged easement. Plaintiffs claim that the servient tenement is a parcel of land now owned by the estate of Charles Erickson, deceased, and which adjoins plaintiffs’ land.
The essential facts, as shown by the findings, which are not attacked, are as follows: Nathan and Isaac Goldtree were the owners of a parcel of land in block 14 of the - city of San Luis' Obispo fronting on Monterey Street. On August 21, 1882, the Goldtrees, by grant deed, conveyed to one Oaks the westerly part of this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McDaniel v. CummingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Shirley v. CrabbIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Sierra Union Water & Mining Co. v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Pinheiro v. BettencourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Cohen v. Adolph Kutner Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Whiting v. SquegliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Mason v. GarrisonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- Rothschild v. WolfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Roxana Petroleum Corp. v. CornCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Griffin v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.