Legal Opinion

Whiting v. Squeglia

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1924No. Docket No. 4362PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Audreani & Haines and John L. Bisher, Jr., fur Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

The essential facts of the controversy herein may be briefly stated as follows: By a written conditional sales contract Joe Bozzani and A. Bozzani, doing business as copartners under the firm name of Bozzani Motor Car Company, agreed to sell to Guiseppi Squeglia, and said Squeglia agreed to buy from said Bozzani Motor -Car Company, a Fiat automobile for the sum of $6,250. In partial payment therefor Squeglia gave to Bozzani Motor Car Company a Cole automobile at the agreed value of $3,500. The balance of the purchase price of the Fiat automobile was to be paid in monthly installments. The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Tarke v. BinghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Mooney v. CyriacksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Stern v. Sunset Road Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Kell v. TrenchardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. KochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Sharkey v. Burlingame Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Medhus v. DutterMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Posey v. LeavittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. People v. De VoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API