Cohen v. Adolph Kutner Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
In this case defendants’ demurrer to the complaint was sustained without leave to amend and judgment was accordingly entered.
Plaintiff sought by this action to quiet title to an alleged easement on the land adjoining her property which was owned by the defendants; for an injunction to restrain defendants from interfering with plaintiff’s use of the said easement; for damages; and for other relief. The essential facts set forth in the complaint are as follows: In 1885 W. D. Grady was the owner of lots 27, 28, and 29 of block 72 of the city of Fresno. Defendants herein are his successors in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Heartt v. . KrugerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Cook v. C., B. & Q. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1875
- Shirley v. CrabbIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Hahn v. Baker Lodge, No. 47Oregon Supreme Court · 1891
- Douglas v. . CoonleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hasselbring v. KoepkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Fisher v. General Petroleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Mason v. GarrisonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- Johnson v. MeiersMontana Supreme Court · 1946
- Rothschild v. WolfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.