Legal Opinion

Lebanon v. Dillard

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

This suit was brought to recover damages for destruction of shade trees. Judgment was given in the trial court for the plaintiff. The Court of Appeals has reversed the case on the ground that there is no evidence to support the cause of action stated in the declaration. Writ of certiorari has been granted.

The question presented is one of pleading. 'The language of the declaration was as follows:

“On the date aforesaid, the defendant, without authority of .law and without notice, went, by and through its authorized agent, upon the premises of plaintiff, and wantonly, wrongfully and unlawfully…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hord v. Holston River RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Brewer v. Boston, Clinton & Fitchburg RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  3. Bridgers v. . DillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  4. Waterman v. Connecticut & Passumpsic Rivers RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
  5. New Orleans, Baton Rouge, Vicksburg & Memphis Railroad v. BrownMississippi Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wood v. Foster & Creighton Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Newberry v. Hamblen CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Central Realty Co. v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Dixon v. City of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1946
  5. Jones v. OmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API