Legal Opinion

Dixon v. City of Nashville

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 30, 1946PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAMIS, J.

This case involves the right of a municipality in the construction and drainage of its streets to interfere with the natural drainage of surface water to the injury of lower lying lands.

The bill, filed by property owners on Albion Street in the City of Nashville, was dismissed because (1) the work was done in strict compliance with a plan of the city engineer, (2) the water flowing upon complainants’ lands after the improvements were made by the city was found to be "no more, or only very slightly more than before the construction of Eden Street” and (3) the acts complained of in the bill did…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tyrus v. Kansas City, Ft. Scott & Memphis RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Chattanooga v. DowlingTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  3. City of Nashville v. MasonTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Mayor of Knoxville v. KlasingTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Chattanooga v. ReidTennessee Supreme Court · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Columbia v. LentzCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1955
  2. Butts v. City of South FultonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
  3. Zollinger v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  4. Kind v. Johnson CityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1970
  5. Woods v. Incorporated Town of State CentreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API