Wood v. Foster & Creighton Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett
The property owner, Wood, and contractor, Foster & Creighton Co., have heretofore applied to this Court for writs of certiorari which have been granted. The parties have briefed and argued the case before this Court.
The property owner, Wood, sued Foster & Creighton Co., and the City of Chattanooga to recover damages for the unlawful cutting and removing from Wood’s property certain shade trees and the taking of soil from his property. Judgment was rendered against the contractor and in favor of the City. On appeal the Court of Appeals affirmed this judgment.
On July 15, 1946, the State of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Railroad v. BinghamTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
- Newberry v. Hamblen CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Coyne v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
- Chattanooga & Tennessee River Power Co. v. LawsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
- City of Knoxville v. HuntTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Glade v. DietertTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- Oman Construction Co. v. Tennessee Central, Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1963
- Callahan v. Town of MiddletonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
- Valley Forge Gardens, Inc. v. James D. Morrissey, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Smith v. Rogers Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.