Legal Opinion

Hord v. Holston River Railroad

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1909PublishedCited by 21 opinions

FROM HAWKINS. Appeal from tbe Chancery Court of Hawkins County. —Jesse L. Rogers, Special Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

delivered tbe opinion of the Court.

The controversy in the present case arises on the following facts:

On the 4th day of April, 1906, the complainant conveyed to the railway company a right of way through his tract of land lying in Hawkins county. The consideration expressed in the deed was $1, hut the consideration paid in fact was $250.

The right of way lay over and through a rocky ledge, which had to be reduced to the necessary level by blasting with powder and dynamite.

As the result of the blasting 7.6 acres of very valuable land, belonging to complainant, lying south of the right of way,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Watts v. Norfolk & W. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Turley v. TurleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Sabin v. Vermont Central RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1853
  5. Vaulx v. Tennessee Central RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1907

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Black v. Love & Amos Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
  2. East Tennessee Natural Gas Co. v. PeltzCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
  3. Lewisburg & N. R. v. HindsTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Staggs v. Herff Motor Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Betty v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API