Legal Opinion

Newberry v. Hamblen County

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1928PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

This is a road condemnation proceeding’. The issues in dispute relate alone to the measure and amount of damages to be awarded Newberry for the taking of his land, and incidental damages and benefits to his remaining property. Following the report of a jury of view, the case was heard by the Circuit .fudge without a jury. From his judgment both parties appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment as to certain elements of damage and ordered a qualified remand for further proceedings in the trial court as to certain other elements of damage, relying upon the authority of Perkins v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Perkins v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Faulkner v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Lebanon v. DillardTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  4. State v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. First United Methodist Church v. Hearing Examiner for the Seattle Landmarks Preservation BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Whitney v. Ralph Myers Contracting CorporationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. State Highway Commission v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Wood v. Foster & Creighton Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  5. State v. RascoeTennessee Supreme Court · 1944

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API