Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Cox
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 5, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2006-1585PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Theodore Wilson, proceeding pro se, brings this action against Timothy Cox, Chief Operating Officer of the Armed Forces Retirement Home-Washington (“the Home” or “AFRH-Washington”), and the United States, alleging violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. Wilson asserts that he was unlawfully discriminated against on the basis of his age when his security guard position at the Home was converted from competitive service to…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Laughlin v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Theodore Wilson v. Timothy CoxCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Abeywardene v. DejoyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Big Sky Civil Trust v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Bynum v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020