Legal Opinion

Abeywardene v. Dejoy

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 13, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2024-2353Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JINAPALA ABEYWARDENE, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 24- 2353 (SLS) v. Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan DOUG TULINO, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Jinapala Abeywardene, proceeding pro se, sued the Postmaster General of the United States in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia alleging age discrimination and a “violation of [l]abor law, unpaid wages.” Am. Compl. at 3, ECF No. 6. The Defendant removed the case to this Court under

28 U.S.C. §§ 1442(a)(1) and 1446 and then moved to dismiss Mr. Abeywardene’s Complaint under Federal Rules of…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API