Legal Opinion

Garnsey v. County Court

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1898PublishedCited by 23 opinions

From Klamath : W. C. Hale, Judge. Writ of review by Cecil J. Garnsey against the county court of Klamath County and its judge to review the action of said court in allowing a certain claim against an estate. The circuit court dismissed the writ, whereupon petitioners appealed. The case was heard on a motion to affirm and on the merits.

1Opinion of the Court 1

On Motion to Affirm.

2Opinion of the Court · BeanJustice Bean

1. In April, 1897, a motion was filed in this court to affirm the judgment of the court below on the ground that the appellants had "failed to file an abstract or brief within the time required by the rules of the court. As an excuse for not complying with the rule, the appellants filed an affidavit alleging that the same questions presented in this proceeding were involved in the case of Knight v. Hamaker, which had not then been heard, and *204asked that in consequence thereof the matter be held in abeyance until the final disposition of the other case. Upon this state of…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Knight v. HamakerOregon Supreme Court · 1898

4Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bechtold v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  2. School District No. 68 v. HoskinsOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Holmes v. ColeOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Asher v. PitchfordOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Cookinham v. LewisOregon Supreme Court · 1911

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API