Legal Opinion

School District No. 68 v. Hoskins

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1952PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTooze, J.

This is a proceeding by writ of review, instituted by School District No. 68 of Yamhill county, Oregon, for the purpose of having reviewed the action of the District Boundary Board of Yamhill county, relating to a change in boundaries of said district. The other plaintiffs, S. A. Stone, A. J. Lyon, Lucile Ingraham, G. C. Selby, O. W. Golden, and William A. Dopp, are residents, taxpayers, and legal voters of School District No. 68. The defendants H. M. Hoskins, county judge; A. W. Youngberg and Charles A. Newman, county commissioners; and Lynn Gubser, county school superintendent, constitute…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hall v. DunnOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Bechtold v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Garnsey v. County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Dayton v. Board of EqualizationOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Fisher v. BirkeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hazlet v. GauntSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  2. Anderson v. HadleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  3. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. State Board of AgricultureOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Horner's Market v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  5. School District No. 17 v. PowellOregon Supreme Court · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API