Legal Opinion

Knight v. Hamaker

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1898PublishedCited by 22 opinions

From Klamath.: W. C. Hale, Judge. Proceeding by N. B. Knight against J. W. Hamaker, administrator of'Warren H. Mills, on a claim. Appeal of the administrator to the circuit court from an adverse order was dismissed, and he again appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean

On May 13, 1895, the respondent, Knight, filed in the County Court of Klamath County a petition for an order directing the appellant, Hamaker, as administrator of the estate of Warren H. Mills, deceased, to pay to him the sum of $1,329 on a claim which he had against the estate; and, on a hearing regularly had, the *155county court adjudged and decreed that the said claim was legal and valid, and directed Hamaker to pay the same in full out of the assets in his hands belonging to the estate. From this order Hamaker appealed to the circuit court, and on November 8, 1895, his appeal was dismissed.…

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Cox v. DoddSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. Rutenic v. HamakarOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Garnsey v. County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Tot v. GongOregon Supreme Court · 1918

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API