Legal Opinion

Asher v. Pitchford

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1941PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This is a proceeding by writ of review, under Ch. 2, Title 11, O. C. L. A., to review the decision of the district court for Multnomah county. The defendant in the writ has appealed from the order of the circuit court.

It appears from the return to the writ that the defendant, Clara Pitchford, as plaintiff in the district court, sued the petitioner in the writ, George Asher, to recover the sum of $250, with interest which the complaint alleged “plaintiff loaned to the defendant, for his accommodation and at his request and upon his express promise of repayment.” The defendant in that case…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Elliott v. MosgroveOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Evans v. ChristianOregon Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Garnsey v. County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  4. East Side Mill & Lumber Co. v. Southeast Portland Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Holmes v. ColeOregon Supreme Court · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ross v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Duddles v. City Council of West LinnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  3. Bechtold v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Andersen v. TurpinOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Tracy & Baker v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API