Legal Opinion

Van De Kamp v. Gumbiner

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1990No. B035505PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TURNER, J. *

I. Introduction

The Attorney General of the State of California, John K. Van de Kamp, appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered by Superior Court Judge Edward M. Ross following the sustaining of demurrers to the Attorney General’s third amended cross-complaint without leave to amend. The Attorney General’s action, brought in his own name, was for breaches of a settlement agreement and conspiracy to breach fiduciary duties against FHP, Inc., a health maintenance organization, 1 and for negligent undervaluing of assets and conspiracy to undervalue assets against Ernst &…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. System Federation No. 91 v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Pennsylvania v. Wheeling & Belmont Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
  4. Hodges v. SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Hutnick v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Ladas v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. Rakestraw v. California Physicians' ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. California Medical Ass'n v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Samura v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. McDowell v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API