Legal Opinion

Prall v. GOODEN ET UX

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1961PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action to recover two real-estate-broker’s commissions totaling $1,325.00.

The broker sued upon a written agreement which he had prepared on a printed form entitled “Contract for Exchange of Real Property”. The contemplated exchange of property, which never took place, would have obligated the defendants to pay the broker a commission of $775 for his efforts in disposing of the property which they were exchanging. If performed, the agreement also would have obligated the other parties to the transaction to pay a commission of $550. -

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burgess v. Charles A. Wing Agency, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Reese v. HarperUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Duncan v. BarbourSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  4. Sexton v. KellyOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  5. MELGREEN ET UX v. McGUIRE, INC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Snyder v. LovercheckWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Starkweather v. ShafferOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Widing v. JENSEN, REAL ESTATE COMMISSIONEROregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Mallory v. WattIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Lindland v. United Business Investments, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API