Prall v. GOODEN ET UX
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.
Defendants appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action to recover two real-estate-broker’s commissions totaling $1,325.00.
The broker sued upon a written agreement which he had prepared on a printed form entitled “Contract for Exchange of Real Property”. The contemplated exchange of property, which never took place, would have obligated the defendants to pay the broker a commission of $775 for his efforts in disposing of the property which they were exchanging. If performed, the agreement also would have obligated the other parties to the transaction to pay a commission of $550. -
The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burgess v. Charles A. Wing Agency, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
- Reese v. HarperUtah Supreme Court · 1958
- Duncan v. BarbourSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
- Sexton v. KellyOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- MELGREEN ET UX v. McGUIRE, INC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Snyder v. LovercheckWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- Starkweather v. ShafferOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Widing v. JENSEN, REAL ESTATE COMMISSIONEROregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Mallory v. WattIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Lindland v. United Business Investments, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.