Legal Opinion

Mallory v. Watt

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1979No. 12565PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs-respondents Warren Mallory, Wayne Oppel, and their spouses brought an action for specific performance on a real estate exchange contract. The district court entered a judgment granting specific performance. Defendants-respondents Peter Watt and Idaho Apartment Properties (IAP) appeal, alleging that the exchange agreement is unenforceable, and that, in any event, specific performance was improperly granted. We affirm the trial court’s determination.

Idaho Apartment Properties, a partnership of which Peter Watt is the managing partner, owned a number of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. ThacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Bedal v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Suchan v. RutherfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Prall v. GOODEN ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Frisell v. NewmanWashington Supreme Court · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Rockefeller v. GrabowIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Lunders v. Estate of SnyderIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Jones v. MaestasIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Jordan v. HunterIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc. v. J. D. ArcherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API