Baltimore Savings & Loan Co. v. Frye
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C.J.
This appeal presents two questions for our determination. The first is whether R.C. 4735.12 permits payment of punitive damages included in a judgment against a real estate broker. If the answer is in the affirmative, the second question concerns the statutory dollar limit upon recovery.
I
The superintendent concedes that the amount of the judgment against Frye which represents $12,872.84 in compensatory damages, including $2,500 in attorney fees, is recoverable up to the statutory limit from the Ac*166count. The remainder of the judgment, representing $10,000 in punitive damages, is the subject of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Circle Oaks Sales Co. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- State v. PaceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Vicario v. JenkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dent v. WinkleOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Bailey v. GilbertOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
- Moss v. UlmerOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Honeywell v. RitenourOhio Court of Appeals · 1990