State v. Pace

DIES, Chief Justice.

In Manchac v. Pace, 608 S.W.2d 314 (Tex.Civ.App.-Beaumont 1980, writ ref’d n.r.e.), this court affirmed a judgment for appel-lees, plaintiffs below, against defendant, a realtor, for unconscionable conduct under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices — Consumer Protection Act (effective May 21, 1973), Sec. 17.41, et seq., Tex.Bus. & Comm. Code Ann. (1973) (hereafter “DTPA”), holding that appellees were “consumers” under the Act. Appellee Pace was given damages by the jury of $6,000; appellee Reed, $2,000; appellee Carr, $5,000. Judgment was given by the trial court against…