Legal Opinion

Honeywell v. Ritenour

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 1990No. Case No. 89-C-43Published

1Opinion of the CourtDonofrio, J.

This is an appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Columbiana County, Ohio, from the granting of a summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee, Superintendent Margaret J. Ritenour, Ohio Department of Commerce.

Initially, plaintiffs-appellants, David L. Honeywell and Victoria Honeywell, sought recovery from the Real Estate Recovery Fund, R.C. 4735.12.

This court considered a similar application from this appellant in the case of Honeywell v. Superintendent Ritenour, (C.A. 7, 1988), Columbiana County Case No. 88-C-11, unreported. Therein relief was denied by the trial court and this court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dent v. WinkleOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Baltimore Savings & Loan Co. v. FryeOhio Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API