Legal Opinion

Moss v. Ulmer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1986No. 86-125PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The sole issue raised in this appeal is whether appellees may recover punitive damages from the special account under that version of R.C. 4735.12 which was in effect on February 1, 1984 (see 140 Ohio Laws, Part II, 2872, 3093-3094, as amended July 1, 1983). R.C. 4735.12 provided:

“(B) When any person, except a bonding company when it is not a principal in a real estate transaction and except a person in an action for the payment of a commission or fee for the performance of an act or trans*38action specified or comprehended in division (A) or (C) of section 4735.01 of the Revised Code, obtains a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. National Mutual Insurance v. WhitmerOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Baltimore Savings & Loan Co. v. FryeOhio Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dent v. WinkleOhio Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API