Legal Opinion

Daggett v. Prudential Life Ins. Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1936No. 31984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGowen, J.

A demurrer interposed by the appellee, the Prudential Life Insurance Company, was sustained to a bill filed against it by William A. Daggett, the appellant, which bill sought to correct the name of the insured and to recover the face value of an insurance policy less a loan thereon. The court having sustained the demurrer, the appellant declined to plead further, and his bill was finally dismissed.

The facts set out in the bill and exhibits are, substantially, as follows: On January 26, 1916, the appellee, the insurer, issued to “Nasta A. Doggett” a life insurance policy for five hundred…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brooklyn Life Insurance v. BledsoeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  2. Watts v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Aiken v. Atlantic Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Inter-Southern Life Insurance v. DuffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  5. Guetzkow v. Michigan Mutual Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Callender v. Lamar Life Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Chatham v. Occidental Life InsuranceMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Universal Life Ins. Co. v. FordMississippi Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API