Ensminger v. Terminix International Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN C. PORFILIO, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, Terminix International Company contends a jury’s adverse verdict is infested with error which the district court failed to repair when it denied post-trial motions for judgment as a matter of law and new trial. Concluding Terminix has infused the issues with its own interpretation of the elements of a claim of fraud by silence under the structure of Kansas law, we affirm.
In purchasing a home in a Wichita suburb, Cynthia and Danny Ensminger obtained from the sellers assurance the house was free of termites. The Wood Destroying Insect Information…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PRUDENTIAL FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Denison State Bank v. MadeiraSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- Wolf v. BrungardtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Compton v. Subaru of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Wilson v. MeeksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- ClearOne Communications, Inc. v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Hawkinson v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- Smith v. PrintupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
- Mynatt v. CollisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- United States v. MilovanovicCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.