Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Meeks
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 23, 1996No. 95-3390, 95-3397PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN C. PORFILIO, Circuit Judge.
This appeal represents the second time this case is before us. Plaintiffs, Datton Wilson, Jr.’s estate and the surviving members of his family, brought this lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 with pendent state law claims alleging nineteen separate causes of action arising from the shooting death of Mr. Wilson during a confrontation with the Haysville Police Department on December 7, 1990. In the first appeal, we held the individual police officers were entitled to qualified immunity on plaintiffs’ federal claims. Wilson v. Meeks, 52 F.3d 1547 (10th Cir.1995)…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Fogarty v. GallegosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Medina v. CramCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Rimbert v. Eli Lilly and Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Jaramillo v. Colorado Judicial DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Armijo Ex Rel. Chavez v. Wagon Mound Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.