Legal Opinion
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PRUDENTIAL FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 28, 1985No. 82-2444, 83-1073PublishedCited by 179 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) brought this action against Prudential Federal Savings and Loan (Prudential) alleging that Prudential violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA or the Act), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq. (1982), when it discharged six employees and demoted a seventh. The case was tried to a jury, which found that one employee, Douglas Tanner, had been illegally terminated because of his age and awarded him $34,200 in past lost wages and benefits.1 The jury found that the violation had not been willful and accordingly did not…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by179 opinions
- Wilkerson v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Sheldon L. Wulf v. The City of Wichita, Gene Denton, and Richard LamunyonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Jones v. Oklahoma City Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Alvin Rea, Gordon Keepers, Robert Reynolds, Barbara Weightman, and Barbara Van Den Arend v. Martin Marietta CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Duke v. Uniroyal Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
174 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.