Legal Opinion

Prokop v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 21, 2007No. B184025PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BOLAND, J.

SUMMARY

The City of Los Angeles has absolute immunity under Government Code section 831.4 from liability for injuries suffered by a bicyclist who collided with a chain link fence immediately after exiting a class I bikeway located along the Los Angeles River.

FACTUAL, LEGAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

David Prokop sued the City of Los Angeles, seeking damages for injuries he suffered while bicycling along a bikeway, designed by the city, which runs along the south side of the Los Angeles River between Riverside Drive and Los Feliz Boulevard. He alleged that, while bicycling along…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Walt Rankin & Associates, Inc. v. City of MurrietaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. AMBERGER-WARREN v. City of PiedmontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Armenio v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Giannuzzi v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Carroll v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Burgueno v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Leyva v. Crockett & Co.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Montenegro v. City of BradburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Arvizu v. City of Pasadena, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Arvizu v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API