Legal Opinion
Leyva v. Crockett & Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 18, 2017No. D069756PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McConnell, P. J.
INTRODUCTION
In 2013, a golf ball struck Miguel Leyva (Miguel) in the eye while he and his wife, Socorro Leyva (collectively the Leyvas), walked along a public path adjacent to the Bonita Golf Club (the Club). The Leyvas appeal a summary judgment entered in favor of Crockett and Company, Inc. (Crockett), the owner and operator of the Club. The Leyvas contend Crocked was not entitled to summary judgment because the immunities designated in Government Code section 831.4 1 and Civil Code section 846 do not apply to their tort claims. We conclude section 831.4 bars their…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Kahn v. East Side Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Wiener v. Southcoast Childcare Centers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2004
- Schmidt v. Bank of America, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- AMBERGER-WARREN v. City of PiedmontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Arvizu v. City of Pasadena, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Lee v. Dep't of Parks & Recreation, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Toeppe v. City of San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Dli Props. LLC v. HillCalifornia Superior Court · 2018
- Arvizu v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.