Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Dintino

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 9, 2008No. D051447PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McDONALD, J.

Defendant Richard K. Dintino appeals a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. (Bank), in its action against him arising out of his nonpayment of a home loan. The trial court granted Dintino’s motion for summary adjudication of Bank’s breach of contract cause of action, but denied his motion for summary adjudication of Bank’s causes of action for unjust enrichment and money lent. The parties then stipulated to a bench trial on their briefs on the sole issue of the amount of damages due Bank on its unjust enrichment cause of action. The court entered…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Charles Schwab Corp. v. Bank of America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  2. Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Douglas E. Barnhart, Inc. v. CMC Fabricators, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Angelica Textile Services Inc. v. ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API