Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Almanzar
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 17, 2009PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 15, 2008, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving, unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant worked as an apartment building superintendent for a realty management company for a little over one year. He was terminated from his position after he left the building without explanation for an extended period of time and did not notify the management company. Claimant had been warned about such conduct on two previous occasions. The Unemployment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of ConfortiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of KryszakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by6 opinions
- Almanzar v. ZAM Realty Management Co., LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- In re the Claim of MaldonadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re the Claim of MaldonadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re the Claim of RosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re the Claim of RosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.