Wilson v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7686 (T. D. 35140):
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge
Jacquard figured nettings, flouncings, edgings, insertings, Valen-ciennes edgings, and Valenciennes headings, conceded to be wholly or in chief value of cotton, were assessed for duty at 60 per cent ad valorem under that part of paragraph 358 of the tariff act of 1913 which reads as follows:
358. Laces, lace window curtains not specially provided for in this section, coach, carriage, and automobile laces, and all lace articles of whatever yarns, threads, or filaments composed; * * * and all other articles or fabrics made wholly or in part of lace or of imitation lace of any land; * * *…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chew Hing Lung v. WiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Arthur v. LaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Vietor v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Robertson v. GlendenningSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- United States v. HaakerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
- Sardik, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
- Levi v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
- Burr & Hardwick v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- Louis G. Rojas Superior Food Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.