Legal Opinion

Sardik, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 8, 1942No. C. D. 646PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Keefe, Judge:

This case arising at New York involves the classification of certain banana flakes imported from Ecuador. Duty was assessed thereon at 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1558 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The plaintiff claims that the merchandise is *401free of duty under paragraph 1618, or, if dutiable, it is dutiable under tbe.provisions of paragraph 762, as amended by tbe trade agreement with Ecuador, T. D. 49710.

Tbe paragraphs in question provide as follows:

Pah. 1658. That there shall be levied, collected, and paid on the importation of all raw or unmanufactured articles not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bakelite Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Carter v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  3. United States v. A. W. Faber, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  4. Causse Mfg. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
  5. Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Standard Fruit Product Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  2. James G. Wiley Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. Christo Poulos & Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  4. Protest 100097-K of David KannengiesserUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  5. Protest 95886-K of KannengiesserUnited States Customs Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API