Legal Opinion

United States v. Haaker

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 11, 1913No. 1211PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 74S5 (T. D. 33659).

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Herring, pickled and boned, and herring, pickled, skinned, and boned, were classified by .the collector of customs at the port of *472New York as fish, skinned or boned, and assessed for duty at cents per pound under the provisions of paragraph 273 of the tariff act of 1909, which reads as follows:

273. Fish, fresh, smoked, dried, salted, pickled, frozen, packed in ice or otherwise prepared for preservation, not specially provided for in this section, three-fourths of one cent per pound; fish, skinned or boned, one and one-fourth cents per pound: mackerel, halibut, or salmon, fresh, pickled, or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chew Hing Lung v. WiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Arthur v. LaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Vietor v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Brennan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1905
  5. Robertson v. GlendenningSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Arnold Sorensin Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. Brown v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  3. United States v. La MannaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. Smith & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  5. Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API