Legal Opinion

United States v. Smith & Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 28, 1924No. 2322PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatfield, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of the court:

The merchandise involved in this appeal consists of embroidered fiouncings or embroideries in the form of fiouncings.

The case was submitted to the Board of General Appraisers on the record, the appraiser’s report, and a stipulation entered into by counsel.

The invoice describes the-merchandise as “embroidered cotton cloth.”

*385The appraiser's report reads as follows:

The merchandise in question consists of embroideries in the form of insertings, allovers, edgings, flouncings, etc., composed of cotton. It was returned for duty at 90 per cent ad…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Movius v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. United States v. Wells, Fargo & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. United States v. RiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Smith & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  5. United States v. Grasselli Chemical Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Pustet v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. United States v. FieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. United States v. American Shipping Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  4. United States v. GoldfrankCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  5. Robinson v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API