Legal Opinion

United States v. Tan

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 10, 1927No. 2868PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

The decision of this case involves the sole question as to which provision of paragraph 1430 is more specific as applied to the importation in controversy, which was stipulated to be “handkerchiefs, from which threads have been drawn and with threads introduced after weaving to finish or ornament the openwork, not including straight hemstitching; and that said handkerchiefs are also made in part of lace.”

*253The two competing provisions of paragraph 1430 of the Tariff Act of 1922 (omitting parts immaterial to the decision of this case), read as follows:

Par. 1430. Laces, lace window curtains,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Smith & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  2. United States v. FieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. United States v. American Shipping Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maupin v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  2. Trimming Clearing House v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API