Legal Opinion

Pustet v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 25, 1926No. 2649PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of the court:

Burses, imported at the port of New York, were classified by the collector as fabrics or articles in part of trimmings, galloons, or braid, and they were accordingly assessed for duty under that part of paragraph 1430 of the act of 1922 which reads as follows:

Par. 1430. Laces, lace window curtains, burnt-out laces and embroideries capable of conversion into burnt-out laces, neis and nettings, embroidered or otherwise, veils, veilings, Bouncings, all-overs, neck rufflings, flutings, quillings, ruch-ings, tuckings, insertings, galloons, edgings,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Smith & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  2. Johnson v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  3. United States v. FieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Glemby's Sons Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. Moscahlades Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. United States v. FieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  4. United States v. GoldfrankCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  5. Adele v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API