Legal Opinion

Todd v. Wallace

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1938No. Civ. 2201PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This action was begun as a quiet title action but the issues were so narrowed that the only controversy at the trial was as to the location of the boundary line between the properties owned by the respective parties, and the plaintiff has appealed only from that portion of the judgment which fixes the boundary line between the two tracts of land.

The appellant is the owner of the northeast quarter of section 25, township 21 south, range 28 east, Mount Diablo base and meridian. The respondents are the owners of eighty acres of land lying immediately west of said land and being the east half of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clapp v. ChurchillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Roberts v. BraeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Vowinckel v. N. Clark & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Perich v. MaurerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  5. Schwab v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hannah v. PogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Mello v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Martin v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Rahlves & Rahlves, Inc. v. AmbortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Vella v. RattoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API