Legal Opinion
Murtha v. City of Hartford
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 29, 2011No. SC 18751PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EVELEIGH, J.
The defendant, the city of Hartford, appeals 1 from the judgment of the trial court awarding the plaintiff, Robert Murtha, $562,277.50 in an indemnification action brought pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 2009) § 53-39a. 2 On appeal, the defendant claims that the judgment of the trial court ordering the defendant to reimburse the plaintiff $460,613.40 in attorney’s fees was improper because the fees were not actually incurred by the plaintiff and were excessive. In response, the plaintiff asserts that the trial court properly ordered the defendant to reimburse him his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cantonbury Heights Condominium Ass'n v. Local Land Development, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- TIE Communications, Inc. v. KoppSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Remillard v. RemillardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Link v. City of SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Hoenig v. LubetkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Grasso v. Connecticut Hospice, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Brett Stone Painting & Maintenance, LLC v. New England BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Liston-Smith v. Csaa Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
- Russo v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Kim v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.