Washington v. Safe Bus, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1DissentSchenck, J.
Motion for examination of defendant under C. S., 900 and 901. From an order directing the examination as prayed, defendant appealed. The defendant's appeal raises the question of the sufficiency of the verified petition upon which the plaintiff based his motion for the examination of the defendant, preliminary to filing his complaint. The challenged petition is in these words:
"Whereas, petitioner has instituted action against Safe Bus, Inc., for money alleged to be due under the Wage and Hours Law; and
"Whereas, certain information with regard to interstate trips made by buses and drivers of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Bohannon v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Hart v. GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Bailey v. . MatthewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Hart v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Flanner v. Saint Joseph Home for the Blind SistersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Kohler v. J. A. Jones Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Guy v. BaerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- In re LewisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Sudderth v. . SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.