Legal Opinion
Hart v. Gregory
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided September 25, 1940PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClaeicsoN, J.
At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the defendant in the court below made a motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit, C. S., 567. The court below allowed the motion and in this we think there was error.
We take it that there is no question as to the jurisdiction to sue in the State court.
In 14 Am. Jur., pp. 440-441, part sec. 247, is the following: “Courts of the United States and of the states have concurrent jurisdiction in all cases between citizens of different states, whatever may be the matter in controversy, if it is one of judicial cognizance, and a conflict of jurisdiction is always…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Santa Cruz Fruit Packing Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- New York Central Railroad v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Kinzell v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
3Cited by27 opinions
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Ballard v. BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Lorenzetti v. American Trust Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1942
- Adair v. the Traco DivisionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Lefevers v. General Export Iron & Metal Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1941
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.