Legal Opinion

Sudderth v. . Simpson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 29, 1944PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Tbe question for determination is tbe sufficiency of tbe affidavit to support tbe order of examination.

It is conceded that as a condition precedent to an order for examination under G-. S., 1-569-510, tbe verified application should disclose: (1) Tbe nature of tbe cause of action; (2) that tbe information sought is material and necessary, and not otherwise accessible to tbe applicant; and (3) that tbe application is meritorious and made in good faith. Washington v. Bus, Inc., 219 N. C., 856, 15 S. E. (2d), 372; Knight v. Little, 217 N. C., 681, 9 S. E. (2d), 377.

Here, it appears from tbe…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ward v. . MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  2. Abbitt v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Knight v. . LittleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Monroe v. . HolderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. Smith v. . WoodingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Guy v. BaerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API